返回列表 發帖
28號當天有隻很大的ufo疑似溫度計  結果格天29號 無法看   30號恢復正常

TOP

TOP

這些到底是不是衛星攝影的干擾..???這答案看來永遠沒人知道

TOP

外星生命找到了? NASA記者會將揭曉


今晚 3:00 ....

·
2010-12-02

·
中國時報

·
【中時電子報卅綜合報導】


據澳洲日報報導指出,網絡盛傳NASA將宣佈在土星最大衛星泰坦發現外星生命。因為,NASA預定美東122下午2 (台北3日凌晨3)舉行記者會,討論一項「天文生物學上的發現」。 


 外星生命堪稱宇宙學的聖杯,那麼,美國航空暨太空總署 (NASA)找到這個聖杯了嗎? NASA記者會預告,題目太具想像力,連日引爆網絡瘋狂大猜謎,解讀無奇不有,甚至有人解讀為「NASA已經找到外星人」,並且說,外星生命就在土星最大衛星泰坦 (Titan)上。 

    NASA記者會名稱「天文生物學上的發現」,天文生物學主要在研究生命在宇宙裡的起源、演化、分佈和未來。


 至少五位科學家將參加這場記者會,他們都是探索外星生命和研究地球極端生命形式的權威。部落格從這幾位頂尖專家的專攻領域,都往「找到了(外星生命)」的方向設想。 另外,NASA記者會要討論最新一期《科學》期刊裡一篇天文生物學論文,論文主題是外星生命,但要美東122下午2時才出刊,文章未出先轟動,無數部落客和專家急電追問論文內容。但《科學》期刊承諾文章解禁前守口如瓶。 


 真相既難知,謠言隨風起,而且誤解往往比正解更勁爆。最震撼的是有物理學位的美國部落格先驅傑森,他說,根據2日記者會出席科學家的資歷,NASA「可能在土星最大衛星泰坦發現了以砷為食物的生命形式,甚至可能找到了細菌利用砷進行光合作用的證據」。文字貼出,瞬間傳遍網絡。

TOP

有消息洩露出可能3:00 NASA 要公佈的是…………….well,我也無法確認


美國宇航局發現了一個完全新的生命形式,和目前居住在地球的任何生物都完全不同。這改變了一切。


在今天的會議上,美國航天局的科學家費利薩沃爾夫 Simon將宣布,他們已經發現了一種細菌的DNA是完全陌生的,這DNA不是使用磷,而是用砷Arsenic 所組成的DNA,細菌使用。地球上所有生命是由六個部分組成:碳,氫,氮,氧,磷和硫。每個存在,從最小的到最大的鯨,共享相同的生活的激流。我們的DNA也都是一樣的。


記得先前說金星的大氣層是很多
金星大氣成分為:96.5%二氧化碳、3.5%氮氣、以及小量二氧化硫、氬氣、水、一氧化碳、 ..so,不適合人類

搞不好那邊就有人是利用 Co2 呼吸

TOP

NASA這篇報導  : http://www.nasa.gov/topics/universe/features/astrobiology_toxic_chemical.html


相關中文報導 : http://www.libertytimes.com.tw/2010/new/dec/3/today-int8.htm

外星人有影? 地球細菌靠砷也能活
〔編譯陳成良卅綜合2日外電報導〕美國國家航空暨太空總署(NASA)日前預告將於美東時間2日下午2點(台灣時間3日凌晨3點)召開記者會,討論一個「天體生物學上的發現」,並透露「將對外星生命證據的尋找帶來衝擊」。由於NASA擺出大陣仗,令網路上一度盛傳NASA將宣布在土星最大衛星「泰坦」發現外星生命,後來NASA提前透露主要內容,原來是在地球上發現一種靠砷(砒霜)也能存活的堅韌細菌,有望解開生命在原始地球出現的奧秘,進而推斷其它星球有沒有可能出現生命。
美優勝美地國家公園莫諾湖發現
據英國每日電訊報2日報導,NASA這次將要發布的訊息是與一種在美國加州優勝美地國家公園莫諾湖(Mono Lake)新發現的細菌有關,這種細菌能夠用砷替代磷維持生命。此前一直認為砷有劇毒,生物無法在砷含量過高的環境中存活。地球的原始大氣中含有磷,為生命的產生創造了重要條件。科學家此前認為,其它星球如果存在生命,含磷大氣也不可或缺。但新發現的細菌推翻了這一結論,NASA專家認為有關外星生命的理論可能需要改寫。
證明有第二種生命型態共存
這群細菌的棲息環境類似遠古時代的地球,當時能呼吸的生物尚未得到地球大氣層包覆的保護。莫諾湖含有大量的砷,鹼度非常高,透露了外星生命的可能性。NASA相信,這項發現證明了「幽影(shadow)生物」的理論,也就是有著第二種生命型態與我們已知的生命型態共存,這種生物存活在以前被認為不可能滋養生命的惡劣環境中。
學者︰它們是共享地球的外星人
按照理論,如果細菌可以在這種環境存活,它們也可以在外星球中生存,一旦環境條件改善,甚至可以演化成像人類一樣的智慧生物。
倫敦行星科學中心的天體生物學家達特奈說,如果這種有機體可以用砷來進行新陳代謝,就顯示它們是另一種生命型態,「它們是外星人,但和我們共享同一個地球」。

TOP

NASA官網 GOOGLE翻一下吧
其它英文報導  : http://www.astrobiology.com/news/viewpr.html?pid=32186

WASHINGTON -- NASA-fundedastrobiology research has changed the fundamental knowledge about whatcomprises all known life on Earth.


Researchersconducting tests in the harsh environment of MonoLake in California have discovered the first knownmicroorganism on Earth able to thrive and reproduce using the toxic chemicalarsenic. The microorganism substitutes arsenic for phosphorus in its cellcomponents.

"Thedefinition of life has just expanded," said Ed Weiler, NASA's associateadministrator for the Science Mission Directorate at the agency's Headquartersin Washington."As we pursue our efforts to seek signs of life in the solar system, wehave to think more broadly, more diversely and consider life as we do not knowit."

Thisfinding of an alternative biochemistry makeup will alter biology textbooks andexpand the scope of the search for life beyond Earth. The research is publishedin this week's edition of Science Express.

Carbon,hydrogen, nitrogen, oxygen, phosphorus and sulfur are the six basic buildingblocks of all known forms of life on Earth. Phosphorus is part of the chemicalbackbone of DNA and RNA, the structures that carry genetic instructions forlife, and is considered an essential element for all living cells.

Phosphorusis a central component of the energy-carrying molecule in all cells (adenosinetriphosphate) and also the phospholipids that form all cell membranes. Arsenic,which is chemically similar to phosphorus, is poisonous for most life on Earth.Arsenic disrupts metabolic pathways because chemically it behaves similarly tophosphate.

"Weknow that some microbes can breathe arsenic, but what we've found is a microbedoing something new -- building parts of itself out of arsenic," saidFelisa Wolfe-Simon, a NASA Astrobiology Research Fellow in residence at theU.S. Geological Survey in Menlo Park, Calif., and the research team's leadscientist. "If something here on Earth can do something so unexpected,what else can life do that we haven't seen yet?"

Thenewly discovered microbe, strain GFAJ-1, is a member of a common group ofbacteria, the Gammaproteobacteria. In the laboratory, the researcherssuccessfully grew microbes from the lake on a diet that was very lean onphosphorus, but included generous helpings of arsenic. When researchers removedthe phosphorus and replaced it with arsenic the microbes continued to grow.Subsequent analyses indicated that the arsenic was being used to produce thebuilding blocks of new GFAJ-1 cells.

Thekey issue the researchers investigated was when the microbe was grown onarsenic did the arsenic actually became incorporated into the organisms' vitalbiochemical machinery, such as DNA, proteins and the cell membranes. A varietyof sophisticated laboratory techniques was used to determine where the arsenicwas incorporated.

Theteam chose to explore Mono Lake because of itsunusual chemistry, especially its high salinity, high alkalinity, and highlevels of arsenic. This chemistry is in part a result of Mono Lake'sisolation from its sources of fresh water for 50 years.

Theresults of this study will inform ongoing research in many areas, including thestudy of Earth's evolution, organic chemistry, biogeochemical cycles, diseasemitigation and Earth system research. These findings also will open up newfrontiers in microbiology and other areas of research.

"Theidea of alternative biochemistries for life is common in science fiction,"said Carl Pilcher, director of the NASA Astrobiology Institute at the agency'sAmes Research Center in Moffett Field, Calif. "Until now a life form usingarsenic as a building block was only theoretical, but now we know such lifeexists in Mono Lake."

Theresearch team included scientists from the U.S. Geological Survey, ArizonaState University in Tempe, Ariz., Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory inLivermore, Calif., Duquesne University in Pittsburgh, Penn., and the StanfordSynchroton Radiation Lightsource in Menlo Park, Calif.

NASA'sAstrobiology Program in Washington contributed funding for the research throughits Exobiology and Evolutionary Biology program and the NASA AstrobiologyInstitute. NASA's Astrobiology Program supports research into the origin,evolution, distribution, and future of life on Earth.

Formore information about the finding and a complete list of researchers, visit:
http://astrobiology.nasa.gov

NASAAstrobiology Announcement Background



Thesix basic building blocks of all known forms of life on Earth are: carbon,hydrogen, nitrogen, oxygen, phosphorus, and sulfur (CHNOPS) and until now,exceptions have not been found. Phosphorus is a key component of DNA, RNA (thegenetic blueprint and protein machinery molecules), adenosine triphosphate, ATP(the energy currency molecule) and phospholipids that form cell membranes.Nitrogen and phosphorus can be limiting in the environment and are often addedto managed environments (e.g. fertilizers contain N and P). Phosphorus andarsenic are in the same group in the Periodic Table. They have similar chemicaland physical properties and therefore should engage in similar chemistries.

Arsenicis poisonous for most Earth life, because it competes with phosphorus in somebiological molecules that disrupt cellular processes. Until now, we knew of noorganism that could use these arsenic-substituted compounds.

KeyMessages

*Astrobiologists have isolated the first known living organism that can usearsenic in place of phosphorus in its major macromolecules

*The newly discovered microbe can use arsenic to thrive and reproduce whenphosphorus is not available

*This is an example of "Life as we do not know it" and has significantimplications for searching for life elsewhere in the universe.


*Bioessential element substitutions have been hypothesized and detailed inscience fiction but this is the first living example

*The study is funded at approximately $300,000 by NASA's Astrobiology Program

*The arsenic-using microbe was isolated from a sample taken from sediments inCalifornia's Mono Lake. Mono Lake is an extremeenvironment with very high pH, high alkalinity and high levels of arsenic


*The paper provides evidence of substitution by As for P in DNA (geneticblueprint), RNAs (the machinery for protein synthesis) and ATP.


*While this organism could turn out to be an isolated case, it also might pointto the possible existence of other alternatives/substitutions to the standardbiochemical components of life


*The implications of the arsenic-for-phosphorus substitution may have profoundgeochemical and evolutionary significance

*This study highlights the need to keep our search broad and not focused onbiosignatures that could be Earth-centric


01.JPG



01.JPG


TOP

Giant Stealth Planet May Explain Rain of Comets from Solar System's Edge巨大隱形行星,可能可以解釋太陽系邊緣的雨彗星Nibiru ?? Nemesis ????

http://news.yahoo.com/s/space/20101204/sc_space/giantstealthplanetmayexplainrainofcometsfromsolarsystemsedge




yahoo 的新聞



沒時間了, 先用 google ,加減看



space.com - 週六 124上午9:00東部


我們的太陽可能有一個同伴,擾亂彗星從太陽系邊緣 - 一個巨大的星球,高達四倍木星的質量,研究者建議。



NASA
的太空望遠鏡在去年推出可能很快檢測到這樣的隱形伴侶我們的太陽,如果它確實存在,在遙遠的冰冷領域的彗星分娩奧爾特雲,這與我們的太陽系周圍數十億冰冷的對象。


潛在的珍寶木星可能會是一個世界如此寒冷,很難被發現,研究人員說。
可以發現多達 30,000天文單位從太陽。一個非盟之間的距離是地球和太陽對 9300萬英里(1.5億公里)。


大多數系統的星星和太陽一樣 - 所謂的G類恆星 - 擁有同伴。
只有三分之一的單星系統,像我們的太陽系。


不是剋星


科學家已經提出一個隱藏的明星,他們稱之為復仇女神,可能隱藏著一光年左右的距離我們的太陽。他們建議,在其軌道上,這個紅矮星或褐矮星會定期進入奧爾特雲,擁擠,許多彗星的軌道有一些下降,造成對地球。這將提供一個解釋什麼似乎是一個週期的大規模滅絕了。


然而,其他天文學家最近發現,如果復仇確實存在,它的軌道幾乎無法聲稱的那樣穩固。


現在,研究者指出,以證明我們的太陽可能有一個不同的排序的伴侶。


為了避免混淆與復仇模式,天體物理學家約翰 Matese和丹尼爾惠特邁爾在路易斯安那大學拉斐特配音的猜想對象橋川” - 這個好姐妹的女神復仇女神在希臘神話中,和名稱提出了科學家的工作在NASA的寬
場紅外線探測(明智)太空望遠鏡。


這是明智天文台,利用其全視紅外眼,隨時有最好的機會發現橋川,如果這個伴侶太陽存在於所有的研究人員說。
[智望遠鏡的驚人圖像]

Matese詳細的研究和惠特邁爾 1117在線版的雜誌伊卡洛斯。


彗星太陽拋到伴侶


研究人員指出,大多數彗星飛進太陽系內部似乎來自外部地區的奧爾特雲。他們的計算表明該行星引力的影響一至四次大規模的木星在這個區域可能負責。


兩個世紀以來的觀測表明一種反常現象的存在這表明橋川,Matese說。
的概率,它可能是由於僥倖的統計仍然非常小,他補充說。


在拉橋川也可能解釋為什麼矮行星塞德娜有這樣一個不尋常的拉長的軌道,研究人員補充說。


如果橋川存在,它可能會很冷,大約零下100華氏度(-73攝氏度),他們說,這可以解釋為什麼它查出來這麼久 - 它的冷淡意味著它不會任何熱輻射科學家可以
輕鬆點,其距離任意星級意味著它不會反映的光線。



大多數行星科學家不會感到驚訝,如果未發現的最大的同伴是海王星大小或更小,但木星質量天體將是一個驚喜,”Matese告訴 SPACE.com

如果這個猜想的確是真實的,重要的影響將涉及到如何到達那裡 - 觸摸早期太陽系環境 - 以及它如何可能影響隨後發行的彗星,並在較小的程度上,已知的行星。

橋川真的是在那裡?


一個事實,橋川的存在是有問題的,因為模式出現在外部奧爾特雲是沒有看到在內部奧爾特。


傳統觀念認為,該模式應趨向關聯,他們不這樣做,”Matese說。


如果智隊是幸運的,它抓住證據的橋川太陽能同伴前兩次太空天文台最初的使命結束了十月。
這可能足以證實該對象的存在,在短短幾個月內,研究人員分析Wise的數據。


但是,如果檢測到的跡象智橋川只有一次(或根本沒有),研究人員將必須等待數年為其他望遠鏡來證實或否認潛在太陽同伴的存在,Matese說。


TOP

本帖最後由 lbboy 於 2010-12-6 11:06 編輯


30,000 天文單位遠
質量木星的4倍以上
這個跟 奇塔人 描述的 nibiru (距離 ? 大小 ?) 不知道 有沒有 相同的地方呢!??
真相並不存在

TOP

應該是這篇相關的翻譯

科學網訊北京時間12月1日消息,美國路易斯安那大學行星科學家日前通過對一個100多年的彗星觀測數據進行分析後證實了此前提出的一個假設,即一個木星大小的黑色天體或許正潛伏於太陽系的外邊緣,而且正在向地球方向拋出大量的冰和塵埃。

研究人員對小行星中心數據庫中的大約100顆彗星的軌道進行了分析,並得出結論認為,生成於奧爾特雲的彗星80%都是被星系引力推出來的。剩下的20%則需要一個遙遠的天體的推動,這個遙遠的天體質量可能是木星質量的1.4倍左右。馬特斯表示,“比木星質量小的天體不可能強大到足以完成如此壯舉。而如果它是比木星質量大得多的天體,如一顆褐矮星,那它產生的結果則遠不止我們所推斷的20%這一數據。”


       但是,仍然存在一個問題。 ”這一圖案僅適用於來自球狀奧爾特雲外層的彗星,奧爾特雲外層範圍介於距離太陽的0.3光年到0.8光年之間。而來自奧爾特雲內層的彗星則不會產生同樣的圖案。馬特斯表示,“這就非常麻煩,它需要一個全新的動力學解釋。


       加拿大理論天體研究所行星科學家納森-凱博表示,關於奧爾特雲彗星是如何引人注目的。 ”“我認為所有問題將在未來五到十年內解決。 ”馬特斯認為,我們也許並不需要等得太久。像“命運女神”這樣的天體現在已可以通過美國宇航局寬視野紅外巡天探測器觀測到。他表示,寬視野紅外巡天探測器將會驗證我們的推測。我們需要耐心等待。


       據外國媒體報導,早在1999年,馬特斯和同事丹尼爾-懷特米爾就曾提出,太陽可能有一個隱藏的伴星,它將奧爾特雲中的冰質天體不斷地拋向太陽系內。奧爾特雲是太陽系邊緣的一個球狀雲團,裡面充滿了彗星。近期,馬特斯和懷特米爾又對1898年以來的彗星觀測數據重新進行分析,證實了他們最初的理論:從地球的角度能夠看到的彗星,大約有20%都是來自一顆遙遠的黑色行星。


       更早以前,還有人提出一種概念,即一顆昏暗的褐矮星或紅矮星(被命名為“復仇女神”)每3000萬年左右都會拋出致命的彗星雨砸向地球。馬特斯的理論也算是對這種概念的回應。不過,後來的研究表明,地球上物種大規模滅絕與“復仇女神”預言並沒有直接聯繫,因此許多天文學家現在認為這一天體並不存在。


       但是,馬特斯表示,“我們開始問許多人,對於我們正在分析的現有數據,你希望能夠推斷出什麼類型的天體?究竟是什麼樣的可能軌道使得它們如此靠近太陽,以至於我們都能夠發現它們。”


       美國路易斯安那大學行星科學家約翰-馬特斯表示,“我們已經積累了10年以上的數據來檢驗這種假設。為了進一步對假設進行檢驗,我們將觀測的彗星數量提高了一倍。只有到現在,我們才能夠檢驗到那裡有一個木星質量大小的天體。”


       形成彗核的宇宙雪球通常懸浮於奧爾特雲中,直到它們的軌道被外力改變。馬特斯認為,這種外部推力可能有三種來源。首先,銀河系盤持續不變的重力可以將彗星從它們的冰質家園中拖出來並拋向太陽系中。其次,一顆路過的恆星可以將彗星從奧爾特雲中震出來。第三種可能就是一顆更大的伴星,如“復仇女神”或“命運女神”,也可以將彗星從它們舒適的家園中吸引出來。電腦模型顯示,在每一種假設中,彗星都會在太空中給出一個特徵圖。馬特斯表示,“我們對這些圖案進行了認真研究,並提出疑問,'是否還有更多的關於一顆路過恆星引起彗星軌道變化的證據圖案呢?

研究人員對小行星中心數據庫中的大約100顆彗星的軌道進行了分析,並得出結論認為,生成於奧爾特雲的彗星80%都是被星系引力推出來的。剩下的20%則需要一個遙遠的天體的推動,這個遙遠的天體質量可能是木星質量的1.4倍左右。馬特斯表示,“比木星質量小的天體不可能強大到足以完成如此壯舉。而如果它是比木星質量大得多的天體,如一顆褐矮星,那它產生的結果則遠不止我們所推斷的20%這一數據。”


       但是,仍然存在一個問題。 ”這一圖案僅適用於來自球狀奧爾特雲外層的彗星,奧爾特雲外層範圍介於距離太陽的0.3光年到0.8光年之間。而來自奧爾特雲內層的彗星則不會產生同樣的圖案。馬特斯表示,“這就非常麻煩,它需要一個全新的動力學解釋。


       加拿大理論天體研究所行星科學家納森-凱博表示,關於奧爾特雲彗星是如何引人注目的。 ”“我認為所有問題將在未來五到十年內解決。 ”馬特斯認為,我們也許並不需要等得太久。像“命運女神”這樣的天體現在已可以通過美國宇航局寬視野紅外巡天探測器觀測到。他表示,寬視野紅外巡天探測器將會驗證我們的推測。我們需要耐心等待。
真相並不存在

TOP

原文報導 : http://www.tehrantimes.com/index_View.asp?code=231641

Giant stealth planet may explain rain of comets from solar system's edge

Our sun may have a companion that disturbs comets from the edge of the solar system — a giant planet with up to four times the mass of Jupiter, researchers suggest.

A NASA space telescope launched last year may soon detect such a stealth companion to our sun, if it actually exists, in the distant icy realm of the comet-birthing Oort cloud, which surrounds our solar system with billions of icy objects.

The potential jumbo Jupiter would likely be a world so frigid it is difficult to spot, researchers said. It could be found up to 30,000 astronomical units from the sun. One AU is the distance between the Earth and the sun, about 93 million miles (150 million km).

Most systems with stars like our sun — so-called class G stars — possess companions. Only one-third are single-star systems like our solar system.

Scientists have already proposed that a hidden star, which they call “Nemesis,” might lurk a light-year or so away from our sun. They suggest that during its orbit, this red dwarf or brown dwarf star would regularly enter the Oort cloud, jostling the orbits of many comets there and causing some to fall toward Earth. That would provide an explanation for what seems to be a cycle of mass extinctions here.

Still, other astronomers recently found that if Nemesis did exist, its orbit could not be nearly as stable as claimed.

Now researchers point to evidence that our sun might have a different sort of companion.

To avoid confusion with the Nemesis model, astrophysicists John Matese and Daniel Whitmire at the University of Louisiana at Lafayette dub their conjectured object “Tyche” — the good sister of the goddess Nemesis in Greek mythology, and a name proposed by scientists working on NASA's Wide-Field Infrared Survey Explorer (WISE) space telescope. It is the WISE observatory that, using its all-seeing infrared eye, stands the best chance of having spotted Tyche, if this companion to the sun exists at all, the researchers said. (WISE telescope's amazing images)

Matese and Whitmire detailed their research Nov. 17 online edition of the journal Icarus.

The researchers noted that most comets that fly into the inner solar system seem to come from the outer region of the Oort cloud. Their calculations suggest the gravitational influence of a planet one to four times the mass of Jupiter in this area might be responsible.

Two centuries of observations have indicated an anomaly that suggests the existence of Tyche, Matese said. The “probability that it could be caused by a statistical fluke has remained very small,” he added.

The pull of Tyche might also explain why the dwarf planet Sedna has such an unusually elongated orbit, the researchers added.

If Tyche existed, it would probably be very cold, roughly minus 100 degrees F (-73 degrees C), they said, which could explain why it has escaped detection for so long — its coldness means that it would not radiate any heat scientists could easily spot, and its distance from any star means it would not reflect much light.

“Most planetary scientists would not be surprised if the largest undiscovered companion was Neptune-sized or smaller, but a Jupiter-mass object would be a surprise,” Matese told SPACE.com.

“If the conjecture is indeed true, the important implications would relate to how it got there — touching on the early solar environment — and how it might have affected the subsequent distributions of comets and, to a lesser extent, the known planets.”

(Source: Space.com)


圖片引用自 : http://big5.xinhuanet.com/gate/big5/news.xinhuanet.com/world/2010-12/01/c_12835037.htm


06.JPG




06.JPG



TOP

網路上看到的分享給大家

木星的雲:不同顏色和不同海拔  http://woodahl.physics.iupui.edu/Astro100/

06.JPG


科氏對木星的大紅斑

06.JPG

木星雲的類型和海拔

06.JPG



木星的三雲級別:氨,氫化銨,水

06.JPG

TOP

本帖最後由 Josefinchen 於 2010-12-7 03:58 編輯

NASA 公佈發表有關柯伊伯帶塵  http://geeked.gsfc.nasa.gov/?p=4427

有空在慢慢翻譯

模型模擬碰撞疏導柯伊伯帶塵


影片網址  : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BYQZRgWwXgQ&feature=player_embedded


The official count of candidate planets around other stars recently hit a whopping 500. But when the first extrasolar planets — often called exoplanets — were discovered, many scientists weren’t sure if they should believe their own data. The first confirmed exoplanets were found around a stellar corpse called a pulsar, born of a supernova explosion of a star. And we also found lots of so-called hot Jupiters, huge steaming gasballs orbiting many times closer to their host stars than Mercury orbits the sun.


How do exoplanets come to exist? How do they evolve over billions of years? And how do they die? If you’re curious and have 10 minutes, listen to my podcast, The Birth, Life, and Death of Alien Planets, on “365 Days of Astronomy.” (It’s a daily podcast produced by the International Year of Astronomy 2009.) You can also just download the (11 Mb) .mp3 file here and listen to it on your iPod or other media player. This blog post is adapted from the podcast transcript, if you prefer to read rather than listen to the 10-minute broadcast

The race is still on to discover more planets, and scores are promised thanks to missions like the Kepler space observatory. Meanwhile, down here on earth, exoplanets scientists are scratching their heads, mining their data, and tweaking their theoretical models to try and make sense of the diversity of alien worlds we have already found.

Here at NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center, where I work as a science writer, we’ve got a whole group of scientists obsessed with exoplanets. They took me on a whirlwind tour of the birth, life, and death of planetary systems. It all starts with a collapsing cloud of gas that forms an infant stars surrounded by a spinning disk of gas and dust — the stuff of which planets are made. A protoplanetary disk.


JENNIFER WISEMAN: Young protostars are buried in a large envelope of dense gas, kind of flattened like a fluffy pancake, but it can extend out to thousands of astronomical units, the distance from the Sun to the Earth.”


DANIEL PENDICK: That’s Jennifer Wiseman. She studies star birth and is the new senior project scientist for the Hubble Space Telescope. She’s also the chief of Goddard’s ExoPlanets and Stellar Astrophysics Laboratory, which is home to many of the exoplanet researchers here at Goddard.

WISEMAN: You have this puffy but dense sort of pancake of gas, swirling around, and in the interior part of this, material is being gravitationally sucked into a tighter accretion disk that’s right around this young forming star.


PENDICK: OK, so far so good. We’ve got an accretion disk, which is where planets come from. What happens next? I asked Hannah Jang-Condell, a post-doctoral researcher at Goddard and the University of Maryland. She’s also a member of the Goddard Circumstellar Disks Group, about a dozen scientists here active in exoplanet research.

JANG-CONDELL: So basically you’ve got a star. It’s not burning hydrogen yet. You’ve got this disk of gas and dust surrounding it. And planets are starting to form in this disk

PENDICK: Hold on — did she say dust? As in those fluffy dust bunnies that inhabit the underside of my couch? Not exactly. When astronomers say dust, they mean tiny bits of solid stuff, like minerals and ices, floating around in space. The dust grains are on the scale of a micron—a millionth of a meter—in diameter.

JANG-CONDELL: It’s assumed that as you build these things up from the micron size to the centimeter size, that things stay fluffy. So sort of loosely bound aggregates. So they are a lot like dust bunnies at that stage.

PENDICK: So much for interstellar dust bunnies. Now, back to the planet building stage of our story.

JANG-CONDELL: So there’s two main scenarios for the way planets form. There is the core accretion scenario. So you start out with dust particles and they collide and coagulate and become larger and larger bodies. When it gets about 10 to 20 times Earth’s mass it’s able to accrete gas, and then the gas will stay on it. From that point it can accrete gas and become a gas giant planet like Jupiter.The alternative scenario is called gravitational instability. In that case, you have a massive disk, and it’s cool enough and dense enough for it to start self-gravitating. So in other words, the disk will fragment, it will start to form a clump, the clump will become self gravitating, and eventually it will collapse to form a giant planet.

PENDICK: This all takes place in the space of a few million years — a cosmic blink of an eye. Gas giants have to form before all the gas in the system has either accreted onto the star or is blown away by the star’s radiation.Once the gas goes away, the infant planetary system evolves into something called a debris disk. As Goddard exoplanet researcher Aki Roberge explains, the planet-building process continues in debris disks, creating larger and larger bodies called planetesimals. In today’s solar system, planetesimals are known as asteroids and comets.

AKI ROBERGE: They start colliding and sticking. Roughly speaking, it’s just hit-stick-hit-stick, get bigger and bigger and bigger.

PENDICK: Sometimes the collisions are not so sticky. The planetesimals smash together and generate lots of smaller debris particles. In fact, huge dusty disks were discovered around other stars for the first time in the 1980s. Astronomers dubbed them ‘debris disks.

ROBERGE: Over the years, there’s been lots of pieces of evidence collected that these debris disks, they really are young planetary systems. So they are like young, dense versions of our own Kuiper and asteroid belts, and our own solar system probably went through a phase very much like it, a debris phase, when it was young.So any giant planets that would form in the system have already formed because there is no gas left to form any giant planets. And some planetary embryos, maybe Mars sized bodies, are there already. So what’s happening is the late stage of terrestrial planet formation. So you are building up from Mars to real Earths.

PENDICK: Terrestrial planets can have violent births, as embryonic planets up to the size of Mars slam into others and build up larger planets. Also at this time, water rich comets may stream in and collide with the young terrestrial planets. This provides the raw material for oceans and atmospheres.Theory tells us these events must be happening in the dusty disks astronomers study. But we don’t see any of this directly.

ROBERGE: All you can really see, ironically enough, is the very smallest portion. So what you see is the dust, tiny, tiny little dust [grains.] This is the dust that’s produced when two asteroids crash together and break up, or the dust that’s in a comet’s coma that’s being expelled as they evaporate. So actually we see the indirect signs. We can see the tiniest material but we know it has to be coming from bigger things.

PENDICK: At some point, things do settle down a bit. But even in a mature planetary system, the action is far from over. Planets continue to migrate in their orbits, or even be ejected from the system in hair-raising close encounters. And if a planet orbits close enough to its star — even closer than Mercury orbits the sun — it could spiral inward and be consumed. In short, entire planets disappear from planetary systems. Goddard exoplanet researcher Brian Jackson explains.

BRIAN JACKSON: Once you get that close, tides raised on the host star and tides raised on the planet can affect the orbit of the planet. Because the rotation of the star is so much slower than the rate at which the planet is going around, the bulge tends to point a little bit behind the planet. And you can think about the gravitational interaction with that bulge always pointing behind the planet a little bit kind of yanks back on the planet and that can reduce the orbital distance between the host star and the planet.Eventually its orbit will shrink enough that it will be destroyed. That can happen within a few billion years. So a lot of these close-in planets that we see aren’t going to last more than a few billion years.

PENDICK: And even planets farther out from the star can experience dramatic changes because of tidal forces.

JACKSON: If the planet’s orbit is non-circular, then what happens is the size of the tidal bulge when the planet is closest to its host star is bigger than when the planet is farther away. The shape of the planet will change as it goes around in its orbit. That change, that periodic flexing of the planet, dissipates energy inside of the planet. It can drive volcanism, which can cause outgassing and provide an atmosphere for the planet. And we see this sort of volcanism powered by tides in our own solar system, for example, Jupiter’s moon Io undergoes the same sort of tidal heating…and that drives the volcanoes that erupt on the surface of Io.

PENDICK: In fact, tidal flexing could hypothetically turn the surface of a rocky planet into a lava sea fuel massive supervolcanoes. Or it could cause just enough heating to maintain a warm and stable climate, as earthly plate tectonics does on our world.We used to think that solar systems eventually settle down and become middle-aged and sedentary, with stable and predictable behavior. But this does not appear to be the case.J

ACKSON: Among planetary systems, the rule seems to be that interactions can be very violent and dynamic and the orbits can evolve pretty dramatically over time

.PENDICK: Planetary systems can even come back from the dead after the most violent event nature has to offer — the supernova explosion of a star. Goddard post-doctoral scientist John Debes has studied these born-again planetary systems. In fact, the first planets ever discovered around other stars were found orbiting a pulsar — the superdense rotating remnant of a star that went supernova.

JOHN DEBES: What people think happened is that after the initial supernova explosion some of the material fell back into a disk, and that allowed these smaller planets to form. And the only reason we found them is because pulsars are amazingly precise clocks, and you could measure the timing of the pulses of the pulsar, and see that that would change due to the orbital wobble of these planets.What’s great about that system, even though it’s the only one that’s been found, is it really shows the sort of basic process for forming a planet must be pretty easy to do, because if you can do it in the fallback disk of a supernova, you can do it just about anywhere if you have the right amount of material and the right conditions

.PENDICK: Hot Jupiters spiraling to their fiery doom… planets par boiled in molten lava… worlds born from the ashes of dying stars. It sure isn’t your grandfather’s solar system science anymore, with well-behaved old planets in their stately settled orbits. As telescopes give us even sharper views of alien worlds, it’s hard to predict what strange world await discovery.
06.JPG



TOP

所以說 復仇女神只會朝太陽系內丟彗星
並不會進來太陽系內晃晃?!

真是顆奇怪的行星呀
離這麼遠太陽引力還抓的著它

TOP

不知是真是假!

12/8國外網站Examiner. Com報導,在太空中的三個巨大的飛行物體正急速飛向地球!
SETI(Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence;外星智慧搜尋計劃)的天體物理學家可雷格•卡斯諾夫(Craig Kasnov)已經宣布這個信息。
這個飛行物體的長度有數十公里,根據科學家的計算,登陸時間應在2012年12月中旬,日期與瑪雅曆法的終結時間不謀而合。
可雷格•卡斯諾夫說:有非常巨大的飛行體正急速的接近地球,如果不相信他的話,您可以自己去求證,他建議您到以下的網址查詢,輸入這些巨型物體的座標:
http://www.sky-map.org/

19 25 12 -89 46 03 第一個巨型物體
16 19 35 -88 43 10 圓柱的物體
02 26 39 -89 43 13 像圓圈的物體

話說回來,此飛行物體需要2年的飛行!真是奇怪,星門不是打開了嗎!或是使用蟲洞比較快!
還是此飛行物體是從9大行星的其中之一顆出發的!

上面那網站還不錯!

TOP

返回列表